Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

LiLo and Sam Really Do Mean Something

Apr 9, 09 | 8:18 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
We spend a fair amount of time and space at Newser on the ever-continuing drama of LiLo and Sam’s relationship. Behind the scenes at Newser, there is quite often an animated debate about why we’re giving LiLo and Sam so much attention. Many of the other over-50 men at Newser (there are two of us) find our interest excessive—but not me.

Or, after months of grousing, I’ve finally gotten their significance. LiLo and Sam are the first post-gay couple. We’re gay-blind to LiLo and Sam. Nothing askance attaches to them. The word lesbian seems hardly ever—even unconsciously—to arise.

Nor do they seem merely part of the movement to turn gay couples invisible by making them as uninteresting and middle class as any other kind of couple. That is, after all, part of the meaning of the gay marriage issue—we’re ever so unsexy, too. But those gay couples still look gay—as well as boring.

LiLo and Sam aren’t trying to hide in plain sight by being ordinary.


(AP Image)

They’ve denuded their lesbianism in part through all the media attention. Self-promotion creates a noise level that drowns out everything else, including, it seems, prejudice.

It could be the fighting. That’s the universal point of empathy between all couples, gay or straight: You know your own tensions and resentments could as easily boil over in public (and involve changed locks, restraining orders, bouncers, etc). We identify.

And they’re young. It would undoubtedly be different if they were old lesbians. Young lesbians seem, well, more young than lesbian.

It could be that, given everything we’ve seen, each fight as it's been reported, we don’t see a same-sex couple, but a divided couple. By class, for one thing. The Ronsons think they are very New York and superior (albeit via Page Six), while the Lohans couldn’t be more trailer trash. And, indeed, the constant tussle between the families not only makes that point, but further establishes that, gay or straight, you’ll have horrifying in-laws. Of course, Lindsay Lohan is a star, and Samantha Ronson is…hmm, not sure. On the other hand, Samantha Ronson is cool, and has lent that cache to Lindsay Lohan, who, on her own, is a bit of a cow.

At any rate, I’m now giving the issue of why we give LiLo and Sam so much attention a double-dose of too much attention. And yet, I do think it’s worth noting that LiLo and Sam, whether together or not, have broken a cultural barrier. With a little critical interpretation, they’re the Jackie Robinson of same-sex couples. Their very irrelevance and insignificance seems to have made their sexual orientation irrelevant and insignificant, too.

That’s something.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com


7 comments
VIEWING:
 
Robert_Dada
Apr 9, 09 9:45 AM CDT
Interesting observation. Still, I could do with less LiLo on Newser. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
stacysaw
Apr 9, 09 12:42 PM CDT
there's also the strong perception that lindsey isn't a lesbian at all. this is an anne heche thing that will pass and she'll be back with boys in a couple of weeks. she's hyper-femme so no one "sees" a lesbian, therefore the stereotypical image of a lesbian couple isn't there. our culture wants to see it in order to believe it. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
expatinTO
Apr 9, 09 2:16 PM CDT
i enjoyed this... first column of yours ever that i enjoyed i think... very insightful... now when are we gonna have the male equivalent of these two? C'mon Chase Crawford or Wentworth Miller... DO IT! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Zorro
Apr 9, 09 5:27 PM CDT
I agree... an interesting observation... although stacysaw does have a good point, the non-butch partner is getting most of the coverage so there is more of a sense that its just another pretty girl having troubles with her partner. If Sam were the highlight of the coverage I wonder if public perception would be the same. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
avlleRN
Apr 9, 09 9:28 PM CDT
well, what if ellen and portia broke up? ellen is the more "butch" of the two, but she's also more famous, as is Lindsay. Sam was only famous because she was dating Lindsay. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader65981144
Apr 11, 09 2:07 PM CDT
One important note - Hollywood actors are forced to stay in the closet. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader65988150
Apr 11, 09 5:33 PM CDT
It's "cachet" -- not "cache." Kind of a trailer trash mistake, you know? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS