Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

The Times Is Up for Grabs and the Race to Get It Is On

May 12, 09 | 8:00 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
At some point I really will have to stop talking about the New York Times. The people truly interested in this subject are limited to a smaller and smaller circle. And yet, for us, the Times is—as well as a dying way of life—an irresistible soap opera.

As the countdown begins—Fortune reports that David Geffen and Google have looked at buying a stake in the Times at its current depressed price—there are two avid buyers and then a more reserved one. The avids are Carlos Slim and Rupert Murdoch. The doubtful, but willing-to-be-convinced, buyer is Michael Bloomberg.

The Sulzberger family will have to choose one of these rich men to bail them out—there are a lot of Sulzbergers, the family fortune has all but disappeared, and few of them have jobs. They’ll choose the rich man who mollifies or tricks or seduces them better than the others.

The buyer’s game will be to allow Arthur Sulzberger to think that a partnership is possible, that one of these rich men will underwrite the paper and let Arthur run it.


(Arthur Sulzberger, AP Photo)

So far Carlos Slim is, rather astoundingly, the one who is most successfully positioning himself as Arthur’s buddy. Last week Arthur took up his pen (he ought to lie down the next time he gets that urge) to lionize Slim as a man for all seasons. Slim’s game is to bit-by-bit secure, or indenture, increments of the company that, in not so many months, can give him control—all the while assuring Arthur that he is still running the paper. Until, of course, the day he isn’t.

But Murdoch, who spoke incessantly of his interest in the Times during my interviews with him last year, is hardly a naïf. He’s not about to let Slim slip in unannounced. The anti-Slim campaign began yesterday. Murdoch, who since his acquisition of the Wall Street Journal has mostly lost interest in the New York Post, was back using its business page to stir up trouble (he doesn’t want to be seen using the Journals pages for his own agenda). The Post outlined Slim’s obvious takeover—trading debt for enough equity to pounce.

Although Murdoch prefers not to besmirch fellow billionaires, the next step in his anti-Slim campaign will surely be to get into the English-language press all the rumors—as low down as rumors get—that now surround Slim in Spanish. Bad press, Murdoch figures, will run Slim out of town.

At that point Murdoch has to either offer a king’s ransom to the Sulzbergers, which, given News Corp.’s share price, he can’t afford, or convince Arthur that they can work together. I’ve heard Murdoch’s plan. To the suggestion that Arthur would, in this plan, become Murdoch’s puppet, Murdoch imitated pulling the strings of a marionette.

Arthur, while nobody’s genius, will certainly realize, Bloomberg’s close aides hope, that Murdoch is a wolf in a sheep’s suit, and beg the mayor to intercede. Bloomberg’s inner circle of ambitious people planning their future careers would like the Times, but the mayor himself is going to have to be cajoled. He’s interested but is thinking life is too short to battle for the paper and then to have to run it. Still, if Arthur really begs him. If Michael Bloomberg is the only man who can save the New York Times, and if everybody knows that it, and if it isn’t too much money…well, hmmm…the savior of the New York Times sounds pretty good.

But please, join in, all scenarios welcome: Who gets the Times?

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.

9 comments
VIEWING:
 
jamesnws
May 12, 09 10:13 AM CDT
still going on about Rupe and the NYT? like you say, you REALLY need to stop gossiping about it. IF (and thats a big if) Rupe ever buys it, THEN i think its fair to start talking about it. oh and News. wouldnt have a problem with the cash either so thats another thing you have got wrong. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
photostation
May 12, 09 10:40 AM CDT
Mike, Think it's time to see a shrink. You keep obsessing about Rupert and newspapers! Keep the focus on your site. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
DAB
May 12, 09 11:42 AM CDT
Of any of these, I think Bloomberg would be the best for subscribers (who, presumably, have an interest in keeping the NYT as the institution they subscribed to). But it's tricky, since he's running for re-election in the same city that the Times (occasionally) covers. I think you said at one time that the actual newspaper itself is still profitable, if barely. It's all the other stuff they've accreted along the way that's losing them money. So the simple answer is: divest of all the other stuff. If that's not possible, transition the NYT Co into some kind of nonprofit on the public broadcasting model. Pledge drives could actually be preferred stock buys, or some kind of equity purchase, if they don't want to become totally nonprofit. Or find a group of investors. I don't think it automatically has to be a single character, like Rupert or Carlos or Mike. A private equity firm bought Chrysler (not that that turned out to be such a great decision for them); perhaps another firm, or a set of private equity firms, could buy the NYT. Making a sale to a single individual, a la Dow Jones, seems the lazy way out of their financial mess, frankly. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
polstroad
May 12, 09 6:28 PM CDT
Mike--you buy it and shut the fuck up...the paper will be around long after you and I are gone. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
bewilderbeast1
May 13, 09 3:28 AM CDT
and then we'll still be pulping wood and writing in ink and delivering it to doorsteps and throwing it away two hours later (having read news 24hrs older than fresh), then collecting it as trash, and then . . . I dunno why, but I think paper's time should be over. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-3
DeniseVB
May 13, 09 7:27 AM CDT
Mayber bloggers should chip in and buy it, afterall, it's where they get their best stories. We name names too, no "sources say" piffle :) Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
NewserFan
May 13, 09 7:40 AM CDT
How about Bruce Wasserstein? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
Intelligenius
May 13, 09 1:03 PM CDT
Too lazy to do research even at vanity fair level? Try absinthe as a generous dash in foamy espresso, post business lunch in the sun. Pick your own strawberries this weekend, instead of business over gulf. NYT is rock solid, baby wolf, Conde Nast on the other hand, is better off in your absence. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Deantown
May 13, 09 1:06 PM CDT
Um, just off the top of my head, there are UNIONS involved. That alone is a dealbreaker in the Bloomberg LP executive suite. Second, how could it POSSIBLY happen while Mike's mayor? And he's probably gonna get reeelected with 60-65% of the vote come November, which means he's mayor until Dec. 31, 2013. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS