Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter

OFF THE GRID
Jun 10, 09 | 8:39 AM

Are You Dull? A Smartphone Can Tell You

Share
It would be impossible to explain what is actually going on in the meltdown of the New York State legislature—and no one would be interested anyway—except for the point about the BlackBerry. A rich guy, Tom Golisano, came to Albany to complain about taxes and, instead of listening attentively, the head of the Senate, to whom Golisano had made substantial contributions, played with his BlackBerry.

This detail comes from the New York Times, which, in another story, reports that in spite of the recession, sales of smartphones will increase this year by 25%. Smartphones, the Times says, are now a social necessity. If you don’t respond to an email immediately, you’re a slacker.

But the greater social point is what you do with a smartphone in someone else’s presence. Checking your phone is the official, and nearly acceptable, way to say you’re boring me.

The way the Times relates the incident involving Tom Golisano, you would think it is about the uncouthness of Malcolm A. Smith, the New York State Senate majority leader (who is no doubt uncouth). But, in fact, what Smith did is what everybody does. Golisano went on about taxes, no doubt at great length, in words and arguments that Smith, a levier of taxes, has heard an uncountable number of times before, and so Smith phoned him.

Helplessly. I know I’ve tried many times to stop, to keep my hands in my pocket when my mind wanders, and just have not been able to control myself. Any respite to boredom wins out. It is not, it suddenly occurs to me, that tobacco was so addictive, but rather the urge to have a cigarette just when you were getting bored was so powerful. At least checking your phone is much healthier.

Checking your phone is usually not such a social flashpoint as it was with Golisano and Smith because in most cases both parties have a phone. So you check your phone, and I check mine: We’ve merely bored each other—no need to take offense.

It’s not even, necessarily, terrible boredom. It’s just a yen for a little outside stimulation.

High school, these days, must be just that much more tolerable if you can check your phone during class.

But there's a lesson, too, that should be taken to heart by Golisano and by teachers everywhere. When someone is giving you the sign that you are boring, it probably means that you are boring. The bored party may have a certain social responsibility to look interested, but I would argue that the boring party has a much greater responsibility to be interesting. Before smartphones, there was no clear way for a person to necessarily know he’d lost the attention of his audience. But now we do.

In Hollywood, where everything depends on holding someone’s attention, it has long been the custom while pitching a project to carefully watch someone’s eyes; if they wandered you’d know you were losing your chance at wealth and immortality. Warren Beatty, it is said, when pitching his interminable and boring movie, Reds, saw just such a sign and immediately jumped up on a table and dropped his pants.

Take the hint. If someone’s phone comes out, try harder. Break into song.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.

13 comments
VIEWING:
 
RogerMohajir
Jun 10, 09 11:54 AM CDT
I checked my phone several times while reading this column, for which I apologize. Even though you can't see me being bored, it is still rude for me to demonstrate it so openly. (Please don't jump up on your desk and drop your pants to regain my attention. Even though I won't see it, I suspect I'd still be traumatized.) I find it an interesting idea that the use of one's smart phone to indicate boredom is somehow a service to the person being treated with such indifference. It seems to me that it is more a measure of the self-absorption of the person who ignores the real, live human being in front of him/her in favor of checking emails, stock prices, or the weather. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Reader3181
Jun 10, 09 1:30 PM CDT
Well clearly Wolff managed to engage you. You took the bait, you responded—and not without wit, I hasten to add. It's easier to get a banter going with someone who seems attentive (someone who isn't manically checking his phone). That said, there are so many stonking bores out there. It's oppressive, really. I need information, I need a joke. Otherwise, what's the point?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader62209561
Jun 10, 09 12:18 PM CDT
Reds is neither interminable nor boring! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Robert_Dada
Jun 10, 09 1:42 PM CDT
Thanks! You beat me to the punch.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Deebles
Jun 10, 09 1:44 PM CDT
I have a good friend who obviously can't sing: whenever he spots the phone move or the watch check--he blurts, "So, I was blowing this guy...." Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
MathTeacher
Jun 10, 09 1:44 PM CDT
Important information is often boring...doesn't make it less important. Sheep who are easily bored are also easily (mis)led. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
MichaelWolff
Jun 10, 09 2:02 PM CDT
But boring information is often--more often than not--unimportant, and poorly presented. Important information ought to be treated with importance--a little fanfare, a little effort, please. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
MathTeacher
Jun 10, 09 2:12 PM CDT
Agreed.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jun 10, 09 3:53 PM CDT
And boring, unimportant information is safe. After reading Jeremy Beer's post on this site--thanks--it's obvious that we are being treated to lots of information which lacks fanfare because the writers are yearning for fans and the safety of boringly fair.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jun 10, 09 4:36 PM CDT
Why would you want to defend being boring?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jun 10, 09 6:33 PM CDT
Cause, I'm not defending being boring. I'm throwing out a reason for the existence of so much boring, and wondering if it floats. My sputtering, choking squeak admits poor position poorly held.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
wax
Jun 10, 09 9:21 PM CDT
I agree that a great presenter makes all the difference in the world, but "constant partial attention" doesn't help us at all. I think it should be the legislators' responsibility to listen thoughtfully. But we do have issues nationwide regarding concentration on complex issues. Maybe that's why our nation is consumed with exciting celebrity gossip and "reality" shows rather than drab things like taking the time to understand the financial system or tax implications of policy decisions.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
HallieOttVulmar
Jun 10, 09 7:08 PM CDT
I think what's being hinted at, and this type of thing is why I consider Mike to be an important writer, is.............is there something spiritual going on with the addictive impulse to either 1)connect to an "air-mail" wireless data network via a cell phone or 2) use tobacco? As I've wondered whether there might be an unseen spiritual network, uber alles, sentiently tempting: "Use some tobacco and we'll give you some good ideas to cure your boredom"......I've observed the scene from 'The Soloist" when Downey jr, about to get his journalism award, hands his cellphone off to his ex-wife who, putting it to her left ear, listens to the schizophrenic subject of the award-winning journalistic material cite his current requests and neediness. And then when Downey comes back to the table, his ex-wife becomes almost like a wicked nag. Tension builds and then the police do a crackdown on Skid Row. Hollywood, at its best, it would follow that, should implement "the best" ideas. And, although Eszterhas has now renounced the use of tobacco, you have to figure that he made some decent money as writer for "Basic Instinct", a movie which, presumably, made big money. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Nov 20, 09 | 8:32 AM

The Health-Care Wars Have Just Begun

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 18, 09 | 2:40 PM

And We Thought We Hated Mammograms

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 17, 09 | 6:50 AM

Rupert Murdoch’s Guy Gets It

Nov 16, 09 | 12:30 PM

Obama's Secret Weapon: The Hug

Nov 16, 09 | 8:01 AM

The President Wants You to Know He’s Too Dopey to Use Twitter

Nov 13, 09 | 6:55 AM

Does Warren Buffett Know What He’s Talking About?

Nov 12, 09 | 7:02 AM

Is Lou Dobbs the Last Conservative Pundit?

Nov 11, 09 | 9:07 AM

Who Was the Fort Hood Shooter?

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS