Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter

OFF THE GRID
Jul 9, 09 | 9:49 AM

The CIA and Murdoch Will Get Away With It

Share
The CIA tells lies to the rest of the American government. Rupert Murdoch’s tabloids engage in nefarious means, including illegal electronic eavesdropping, to get dirt on celebrities.

The current director of the CIA, Leon Panetta, has apparently admitted as much to Congress. The Guardian says Murdoch has paid out $1.6 million to secretly settle cases of phone hacking.

Each of these stories ought to be seismic. The CIA, at the center of the intelligence debacles of the last decade, ought to be investigated at least as intensely as it was in the late '70s after revelations of its internal spying. The Murdoch organization in the UK, which has as much influence on the British government as any other private business, ought to face the kind of independent examination that could, free from outside influence, send an impressive number of Murdoch lieutenants to jail.

And yet, the overwhelming likelihood is that Washington and London shrug. The CIA and the Murdoch organization are protected by their own consistently bad behavior and negative image.

People don’t get excited about what they already know.

Both the CIA and the Murdoch organization are merely being true to character. Only the most dreary naïf could be outraged by CIA lies and Murdoch’s unscrupulous snooping.

It’s the reverse of institutional integrity. What we have is an example of the power of institutional dubiousness, of a negative brand. Neither the CIA nor the Murdoch papers are living a lie—they’re just doing what we already assume they’re doing. What you see is what you get. The truth is not shocking. Oddly, in fact, it’s reassuring. Finding out that the CIA lies makes us feel that we haven’t been fooled. Learning that Murdoch’s tabloids are sleazy merely reaffirms our sense of taste and standards.

In a sense, they tricked us, the CIA and Murdoch, by being honest—in their way.

Even a smoking gun, and there do seem to be smoking guns here, won’t guarantee prosecution. There are just too many guns here and too much smoke. Both the CIA and Murdoch have been given so many incremental free passes, so much permission to be what they are, to indulge their own natures, they’ve pushed the envelope so consistently and thoroughly that too many people are involved in allowing them to over-step, infringe, abuse. There is no going back. Everybody has facilitated the CIA and the Murdoch organization.

They really have slipped the bonds of outrage.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.

15 comments
VIEWING:
 
DAB
Jul 9, 09 11:43 AM CDT
That describes it perfectly. And, by the way, is in line with what was my main objection to the Bush Administration for 8 years: chutzpah as moral justification. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jul 9, 09 12:03 PM CDT
Actually, you describe it perfectly. Thanks.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader3181
Jul 9, 09 1:23 PM CDT
Won't the celebrities sue? And won't they just pick a fall guy? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
RogerMohajir
Jul 9, 09 3:02 PM CDT
Another important element to both of these transgressions going unpunished is the public's views of the victims. The CIA lied to Congress, and Rupert's crew invaded the privacy of celebrities. It's hard to feel too outraged when Congress is being lied to, instead of lying to us as usual. It is similarly hard to work up much angst over the invading of the privacy of celebrities who dedicate themselves so thoroughly to self-promotion. None of this is excusing the CIA or Rupert. I just suspect that if their acts had been against "innocent" members of the public, the public would be more likely to summon some outrage. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
QueenAlli
Jul 9, 09 3:04 PM CDT
good point.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 9, 09 10:02 PM CDT
Murdoch's private dicks were not just tapping into celebrity cells. They were also listening into members of the government. That's what is so grotesque. He, of course he knows nothing about it, was tapping PRIVATE conversations to print stories to MAKE money. I'm sure this side of the pond has nothing to worry about, but at what point is cheating--cheating? He, not personally I'm sure, stuck a glass to the wall and caring not what was said used it to sell newspapers. There is a word for doing anything no matter how illegal or disgusting to satisfy only yourself. People like him get away with it because he knows that people like us can't really believe that people like him exist. When I read the Times this morning, it made me ill because I'm fully aware that I am a mere gazelle.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
fancygapva
Jul 10, 09 6:02 PM CDT
@deebles--what is the word for poeple who do anything, no matter how illegal or disgusting just to satisfy themselves? I thought it was 2 words, Bush Administration, but I wonder what your word is. I must be a mere ostrich.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 10, 09 6:58 PM CDT
The world is a dull place when viewed only through Bush-colored glasses. Get your head out of the sand and focus on the new threat instead of the one that got away.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
QueenAlli
Jul 9, 09 3:09 PM CDT
"People don’t get excited about what they already know." Very very true. The only thing that shocked me was that these stories made the news. I figured they would be as newsworthy as the opening of a supermarket. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 10, 09 1:49 AM CDT
Yikes. What you know and what you feel about the knowing are two different things. Say you know your husband is cheating. You have all the signs and indications. But you're ignoring it cause you like the house. One night you're reading a book and he walks in with his girlfriend and they go upstairs into the guest room. Now, you, who already knew that he was cheating are dealt a different blow. He doesn't care what you think, you matter not at all. He is betting that you like your book and chair more than what's up in the guest room. See that is wicked and that is the knowing that is new or news,
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
Paolo
Jul 10, 09 4:46 AM CDT
Michael is unveiling that Americans are slipping dangerously close to the Italian way of thinking, which is: if it's illegal, but you can profit from it and have very small chances of being caught, you'd be STUPID if you didn't do it. This is probably the way most people think (except for some old time Americans). This is why we have to at least pretend indignation and demand harsh punishments when the smart ones get caught. The deterrent must be very scary. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
ibivi
Jul 10, 09 5:24 AM CDT
So soon? Panetta has barely started and he's already part of this lying bunch of hapless spies. Shame on him. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
armywife
Jul 10, 09 6:29 AM CDT
ssh, could yall keep it down? my show is on... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
slmetcalf
Jul 10, 09 10:08 AM CDT
I totally agree. They'll get away with it. Nothing will be done. Liberals will continue their smug "I told you so" demure; while conservatives will continue with meaness and denial. Journalistic integrity is dead--Long live lies, gossip and ineptness. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Always_Right
Jul 12, 09 5:44 AM CDT
Wow, Rupert Murdoch is crucifying the other networks by sticking to good honest news reporting. They report the facts, and you form your own opinions. Of course the tingley legged, Obama wet dream, rest of the network and cable outlets are plumeting in viewrship. Just give us the news, and the facts from all sides and don't cram your interpretation of what you think the news is cause we all know that's a fairy tale. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Nov 20, 09 | 8:32 AM

The Health-Care Wars Have Just Begun

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 18, 09 | 2:40 PM

And We Thought We Hated Mammograms

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 17, 09 | 6:50 AM

Rupert Murdoch’s Guy Gets It

Nov 16, 09 | 12:30 PM

Obama's Secret Weapon: The Hug

Nov 16, 09 | 8:01 AM

The President Wants You to Know He’s Too Dopey to Use Twitter

Nov 13, 09 | 6:55 AM

Does Warren Buffett Know What He’s Talking About?

Nov 12, 09 | 7:02 AM

Is Lou Dobbs the Last Conservative Pundit?

Nov 11, 09 | 9:07 AM

Who Was the Fort Hood Shooter?

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS