Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Rocked by 'Friendly' Attacks, NATO Yanks Afghan Training

With 'green-on-blue' attacks rising, coalition pauses to re-vet recruits

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 2, 2012 5:41 AM CDT

(Newser) – With NATO forces in Afghanistan struggling to stop attacks from their own allies, training for all new recruits has been suspended while the 27,000 Afghan troops who work with the coalition can be re-screened for insurgency ties, reports the Washington Post. So far this year, so-called "green-on-blue" attacks have killed 45 allied troops, accounting for 15% of all casualties. NATO officials say many of those attacks happened because the push to quickly develop Afghan police and military forces was given priority over proper security.

"We have a very good vetting process,” said one senior official. “What we learned is that you just can’t take it for granted." In some cases, proper background checks on new recruits were not carried out, nor were Afghan forces always issued IDs and required to display them while on base. Special Operations officials say it could take two months to re-vet all Afghan forces, and the training of new recruits could be on hold for a month. But, as of now, lax enforcement of security rules is over, as troops are being told to stay away from Afghan soldiers and police in vulnerable moments, such as while showering and sleeping. “It’s about force protection without endangering the relationship. It’s a true teeter-totter," said one NATO official.

In this March 26, 2012 file photo, an Afghan policeman checks a man entering a police station near the main gate of a joint civilian-military base where two British soldiers that were part of the NATO forces were killed in Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan.
In this March 26, 2012 file photo, an Afghan policeman checks a man entering a police station near the main gate of a joint civilian-military base where two British soldiers that were part of the NATO...   (AP Photo/Abdul Khaleq, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
15%
2%
43%
11%
17%
11%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 16 comments
njgreen
Sep 2, 2012 11:50 AM CDT
It's easy: bye.
HANKHILL
Sep 2, 2012 10:56 AM CDT
if nato and the other forces were smart they would all get the hell out of there and let these "folk" continue to kill eachother as they have done for thousands of years! GET OUT NOW!
bjcajones
Sep 2, 2012 10:21 AM CDT
With the exception of the Revolutionary War and WWII, the U.S. should not have gone to war.  Every President from Lincoln to Obama have either put us in a war over commerce or ideology.  Thousands of U.S. men and women have died because these men.  The Iraqese (our friends) are now helping the Iranians.  The Afgans (our friends) are killing our troops.  Old men in blue suits send our young to fight their battles.  I had an Arab attorney tell me one time, "If you are not Muslim, you are an infidel, therefore you are nothing.  Nothing is going to change in the Middle East.  Apparently the Presidents did not study history very well; the Crusades come to mind.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne