Supreme Court Refuses Body Scanner Case

A rundown of cases the court refused to hear as new session open
By Matt Cantor,  Newser User
Posted Oct 1, 2012 12:17 PM CDT
An traveller is patted down by a TSA agent at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago.   (AP Photo/Paul Beaty)

(Newser) – The new Supreme Court term, which begins today, won't include a review of TSA body scanners: Justices have refused to take on a man's appeal in a case against the machines, which was also dismissed by federal courts in Florida and Washington, the AP reports. Nor will justices take on a lawsuit, rejected by lower courts, by a family against the Wackenhut security firm, whose guards raped and killed the family's daughter in 1979. A criminal trial found six people guilty in the case; lower courts said the company couldn't be sued for a death so long ago.

Justices have also refused an anti-gay marriage group's appeal, on free speech grounds, against the release of its donor list. Maine law requires groups collecting or spending more than $5,000 in an election to reveal donors; the National Organization for Marriage gave $1.9 million to a PAC involved in the repeal of its gay marriage law. The court will, however, dive into the gay marriage issue itself; click for a look at other major civil rights concerns it will address. Among other cases justices have refused:

  • A Nebraska anti-abortion group's appeal to fight for a blocked 2010 state abortion law requiring women seeking abortions to undergo health screenings.
  • A family's lawsuit over a police officer's fatal shooting of a suicidal boy who threatened him with a knife.
  • A debate over whether Minnesota judicial candidates should be able to endorse other elections' candidates; currently, the practice is banned.

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |