Life of Pi Is Cinematic 'Landmark'
Ang Lee's latest is gorgeous
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Nov 23, 2012 12:29 PM CST
Loading... Please wait

(Newser) – Critics are stunned by the visuals in Life of Pi, Ang Lee's take on the novel about a boy and a tiger struggling to survive at sea. There's some debate, however, over whether the film's story and grand theological questions hold up to its vision:

  • The Los Angeles Times calls the film a "masterpiece": It's "a grand adventure so cinematically bold, and a spiritual voyage so quietly profound," that you hope it never ends, writes Betsy Sharkey. "So magical and mystical is this parable, it's as if the filmmaker has found the philosopher's stone."

  • Roger Ebert is equally impressed, calling the movie one of the year's best. It's "a miraculous achievement of storytelling and a landmark of visual mastery," not to mention "a moving spiritual achievement, a movie whose title could have been shortened to 'life.'" As for the use of 3D, "I've never seen [it] better employed," he writes in the Chicago Sun-Times.
  • AO Scott gushes that "there are images in Life of Pi that are so beautiful, so surprising, so right that I hesitate to describe them," calling the setting "one of the great achievements of digital cinema." Yet the film is "simultaneously about everything and very little indeed. Instead of awe, it gives us 'awww, how sweet,'" he notes in the New York Times.
  • At Slate, Dana Stevens agrees: The film is "'immersive'—even if what we’re being immersed in feels at times like a vat of warm caramel." Her recommendation: "See it stoned."

View 1 image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Life of Pi Is Cinematic 'Landmark' is...
10%
2%
60%
2%
24%
2%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 17 comments
DougMasters
Nov 24, 2012 10:03 AM CST
Saw it... Visually impressive? Yes, it was the best looking CGI tiger I had ever seen.... But it was constantly noticed that it was CGI. Best looking CGI or no, they weren't going for CGI looking ( I don't think ) and it still fell short of being real. HOWEVER Unlike Avatar, the CGI was very VERY fluid, not stiff, I was very amazed at the constant fluidity. The story though, kinda bland.... kinda boring. Not quit my thing. All in all I was impressed but didn't enjoy it.
Seth_Meyers
Nov 23, 2012 7:39 PM CST
Computer-generated tiger looks....computer generated. We'll pass, thanks.
JoeQ
Nov 23, 2012 7:31 PM CST
It kinda looks from the previews like they sorta reused that CGI tiger from the movie 10,000 BC. Not to complain. It was the high point of that movie.