The MLK Memorial Isn't So Bad
Hampton Dellinger thinks monument is actually quite fitting
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Jan 21, 2013 1:58 PM CST
This Jan. 15, 2012 file photo shows the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington.   (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

(Newser) – You've likely heard a lot of complaints about the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in Washington, DC, but to mark MLK Day, Hampton Dellinger defends the monument, point-by-point, in the Atlantic today:

  • King's face: Critics say the statue doesn't look much like King, but Dellinger contends that one part totally "nails it": The "fatigue-triggered creases" carved into the granite under each eye. "They are unmistakable and represent the years of psychological strain that King endured."

  • King's figure: Another common complaint is the way King emerges from the rock, leaving his feet unseen. But that unfinished appearance is symbolic of "King's unfinished life and America's unfinished work in the area of civil rights."
  • The setting: Lastly, many are unhappy the monument isn't contained in a covered space. But King first became known as an outsider—not a power player or politician, but a Baptist minister. And if you want to get literal, "much of King's most indelible work literally took place outside. ... King is deeply associated in the public mind with the most public and unprotected of settings."
"The sculpture of King ... makes him much larger than life but no greater than the change he wrought," Dellinger writes. "And it is much more worthy of the man than the dismissive reviews that greeted it." Click for his full column.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
The MLK Memorial Isn't So Bad is...
4%
3%
0%
59%
3%
32%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 11 comments
America_Great
Jan 22, 2013 9:49 AM CST
It was built by the Chinese. Just another insult to America, but to the African American Community, where Jobs are about as scarce as small businesses. You mean to tell me we couldn't have found stone masons here in the USA?
forus
Jan 22, 2013 2:15 AM CST
Art is always subject to individual interpretation. From my perspective the sculpture is almost comical and lacks the dignity you would hope such a monument would impart. It looks incomplete and poorly represents Mr. King's features. No matter how you reinterpret and embellish its intended meanings, it will always look like an unfinished 'caricature' in stone.
iq145
Jan 21, 2013 9:28 PM CST
All this to-do over nothing. They built him a monument. Period. If anybody deserves one, it is he.