She Has a Protective Order; He Still Has a Gun
'NYT' takes a look at one aspect of the gun-rights battle
By Kate Seamons, Newser Staff
Posted Mar 18, 2013 9:43 AM CDT
   (AP Photo/Al Behrman)

(Newser) – Amid the talk of ammunition magazines and background checks, the New York Times susses out a perhaps less obvious element of the gun-control battle: domestic abusers and firearms. As it explains, only a smattering of states require that those with protection orders against them give up their guns. It shares the situation of a Spokane, Washington, woman, who was able to obtain an order that barred her ex-husband from coming within two blocks of her. But it didn't require that he relinquish his guns, and 12 hours after it was handed down he confronted her at her home with a small semiautomatic rifle; she was able to secretly dial 911 on her cell and was aided by police.

On one side of this battle stand activists for the victims, who argue that a woman's right to her life is superseded by the right to bear arms; the NRA and other gun-rights proponents believe only a felony conviction should be grounds for losing gun ownership rights. The "mere issuance of court orders," isn't reason enough, asserts an NRA lobbyist. The Times' analysis of Washington state records returned "scores" of crimes involving a gun and committed by someone recently issued a protection order, and five cases where women were shot to death within of month of their order. Writes the Times, "In fairness, it was not always clear that such an order would have prevented the deaths. Even so, those cases can show the existing system's weakness in the face of obvious peril." Click to read the Times' lengthy piece.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
She Has a Protective Order; He Still Has a Gun is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 154 comments
Mar 19, 2013 11:33 AM CDT
The NRA doesn't care who gets killed.
Mar 19, 2013 12:57 AM CDT
She called 911 secretly and waited for the cops. The best thing she could have done is protect herself with a shotgun like JOE BIDEN would want you to. She is lucky to be alive.
Mar 18, 2013 9:04 PM CDT
This is where the NRA goes off the rails. They will fight to allow a guy like this to keep his firearms. They feel if the Gov't takes away his right's to a firearm, it leads towards the banning of all firearms. It's nuts.