Obama in Berlin: We Only Need 1K Nuclear Warheads
In Berlin speech, says he wants to see US, Russian arsenals cut by a third
By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted Jun 19, 2013 3:12 AM CDT
Updated Jun 19, 2013 10:22 AM CDT
US President Barack Obama, center background, delivers a speech in front of Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, Germany, June 19, 2013.   (AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

(Newser) – Five years after he addressed a huge crowd in Berlin as a presidential candidate—and 50 years after John F. Kennedy proclaimed "Ich bin ein Berliner"—President Obama gave an address at the iconic Brandenburg Gate today, calling for a major reduction in nuclear warheads. "We may not live in fear of nuclear annihilation—but as long as nuclear weapons exist, we are not truly safe," Obama declared, according to Politico. He said the US could still defend itself with one third fewer nuclear weapons, and said he intended to negotiate a cut to that level with Russia. That would mean taking the arsenals down to about 1,000 warheads each.

Officials tell the Wall Street Journal that the cuts may take place under a new treaty, to follow 2010's New START pact, but the White House will also consider reciprocal reductions without a treaty. Obama also spent plenty of time in the speech endearing himself to the crowd before him (which USA Today notes was limited to 6,000 invited guests), with frequent jokes and stirring references to the city's history. "I am proud to stand here and pay tribute to the past from the East side of the Brandenburg," he said. Of course, hanging over everything was the NSA spying issue. At a joint press conference earlier, Merkel said she and Obama had held "long and intensive" talks about it, while Obama offered assurances that the US wasn't "rifling through the ordinary emails of German citizens ... or anybody else."

View 2 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
In Berlin Speech, Obama to Push for New Nuke Cuts is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 86 comments
Jun 23, 2013 4:11 PM CDT
why dont they agree on ONE each so each leader can try to stick it up the other one's ass!
Jun 20, 2013 5:45 PM CDT
There's something else we need less of - Republicans.
Jun 19, 2013 8:11 PM CDT
I am capable of stupidity, so tell me: once we have a thousand, what is the added detriment of a million?