Sorry Florida, Long-Lost Fort May Be in Georgia
Researchers think historic Fort Caroline is one state over
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 22, 2014 8:11 AM CST
This image titled the 'Founding of Fort Caroline' is from Wikimedia Commons.   (Wikimedia Commons)

(Newser) – No wonder historians haven't been able to find a historic but long-lost French fort in America: They were looking in the wrong state. Researchers from Florida State University say Fort Caroline—which one calls "the oldest fortified settlement in the present United States"—isn't near Jacksonville as long thought, reports Heritage Daily. The 1564 fort was actually on Rhetts Island near the mouth of the Altamaha River. That's about 70 miles away. In Georgia. The discovery would upend some long-held notions about the colonization of the New World and likely disappoint the Fort Caroline National Memorial—in Jacksonville. But there's a big caveat: "We don’t have archaeological proof of the fort at this time,” says FSU's Fletcher Crowe.

Instead, the announcement at a conference is based in part on a detailed analysis of old French maps and coastal charts of the US. “We haven’t found [the fort], but we are pretty much closing in on the site," adds co-researcher Anita Spring." The pair also say they've amassed loads of circumstantial evidence. For instance, they say Native Americans near the fort spoke a language known as Guale, and those speakers lived around what is now Darien, Ga., near the newly proposed site. It's definitely "provocative," a University of North Florida archeologist in the Jacksonville camp tells the Florida Times-Union. But “I don’t think it’s enough of an argument for me to change my mind.” It's not clear when actual digging might start to resolve things. (Click to read about how historians are closer to learning why colonists on North Carolina's Roanoke Island disappeared.)

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Sorry Florida, Long-Lost Fort May Be in Georgia is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 15 comments
bill chinery
Feb 27, 2014 9:21 AM CST
Can one of you history guys explain to me why anyone would put a fort on Rhett's Island in the first place? Was there something in the area of strategic importance at that time?
Feb 26, 2014 1:19 AM CST
It's like the famous Edmund Burke quote: "Those who don't study the past won't be forced to justify their lives with endless quests in search of useless minutia" (or something like that)
Feb 22, 2014 9:13 AM CST
Why would they build a memorial to something if they didn't know where it was?