Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Bill Could Kill Doc-Owned Hospitals

Feds may see $1.2B in savings if for-profit facilities come under new regulation

By Ambreen Ali,  Newser User

Posted Jan 22, 2009 12:36 PM CST

(Newser) – A clause in a child-health bill just passed by the House would restrict Medicare payouts for, and the expansion of, doctor-owned hospitals, the specialized-care units blamed for hurting income at nonprofit facilities, the Wall Street Journal reports. There are 200 such facilities nationwide, touted for their efficiency but criticized for giving physicians a financial incentive to recommend unnecessary tests and surgeries.

If the bill’s Senate counterpart—which has no such restrictions—passes next week, the two will be combined and presented to President Obama. The final version may contain the limits, held up for years by Republican opposition and presidential vetoes. Congress expects to save $1.2 billion if the hospitals are contained, but the industry trade group calls that figure “completely outrageous and false.”

Doctor-owned hospitals don't always have money-losing social necessities like emergency rooms, labor units, or mental health facilities.
Doctor-owned hospitals don't always have money-losing social necessities like emergency rooms, labor units, or mental health facilities.   (AP Photo)
Most hospitals are nonprofits, and they have seen their profits fall as doctors funnel lucrative patients to hospitals where they have financial stakes.
Most hospitals are nonprofits, and they have seen their profits fall as doctors funnel lucrative patients to hospitals where they have financial stakes.   (Houston Chronicle)
Proponents of physician-owned hospitals say they are more efficient than others and thus reduce the overall cost of health care, including Medicare.
Proponents of physician-owned hospitals say they are more efficient than others and thus reduce the overall cost of health care, including Medicare.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It's a conflict of interest between the needs of the patient and the physician's self-interest. They refer the well-reimbursed and less difficult cases to places they have a financial interest in. - Rick Pollack, executive vice president of the American Hospital Association

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 2 of 2 comments
riffran
Jan 23, 2009 5:15 AM CST
Although some docs are unethical, having politicians telling doctors how to do their job, is like a heroin dealer running a pharmacy
Guest
Jan 23, 2009 3:13 AM CST
Because you can't have Communism with socialized medicine and Privately owned hospitals at the same time.

More Newser Stories

I'd Vote for Health Bill: Frist

Obama Success Could Hinge on Address

Reform? We Need a Revolution

Time to Show America Why We Need Health Fix

Aug. Health Reform Looks Impossible


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne