Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Take It to the Supreme Court: GOP to Coleman

Could Bush v. Gore save the Minnesota Republican?

By Gabriel Winant,  Newser User

Posted Mar 17, 2009 9:38 AM CDT

(Newser) – There’s only one thing you need to know about the Minnesota Senate race: It will never end. Norm Coleman, waiting on a state court to rule on his challenge to Al Franken’s 225-vote lead, is being urged by top Republicans to take his case all the way to the Supreme Court, Politico reports. And they're pointing to some notable case history: Bush v. Gore.

Republicans say that the equal protection principle in Bush v. Gore invalidates Minnesota’s nonstandardized absentee ballot-counting methods. “Using the same standards to count votes is a big issue," says Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. Democrats scoff at this; Sen. Harry Reid says Coleman will “never ever” be a senator again. Politico notes that an appeal might also damage Coleman’s reputation among Minnesota votes, hampering a future campaign.

Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington in this March 3, 2006 file photo.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait at the Supreme Court in Washington in this March 3, 2006 file photo.   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
In this Feb. 26, 2009 pool file photo, former Republican Sen. Norm Coleman sits pensively during a court delay before the start of the Senate vote recount trial in St. Paul, Minn.
In this Feb. 26, 2009 pool file photo, former Republican Sen. Norm Coleman sits pensively during a court delay before the start of the Senate vote recount trial in St. Paul, Minn.   (AP Photo/Jim Mone, Pool, File)
Minnesota Democratic Senate candidate Al Franken arrives for the Democratic policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 10, 2009.
Minnesota Democratic Senate candidate Al Franken arrives for the Democratic policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 10, 2009.   (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Whoever the loser is, they’re going to have to examine how good they think their case is, whether they would have a chance of winning, what it does to the state by not having a second senator, the costs involved, all that sort of thing. - Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 2 of 2 comments
Doctor-Zaius
Mar 16, 2009 10:20 PM CDT
Your=You're
Doctor-Zaius
Mar 16, 2009 9:46 PM CDT
If you read Bush Vs. Gore the ruling by the SCOTUS states that this case provides no precident for future rulings. In other words the Supremes knew how jacked-up their logic was and didn't want it to come back to bite them in the ass. Say goodnight Normy, your done.

More Newser Stories

Franken, Coleman Fight Over $94K in Legal Fees

Coleman Takes Vote Battle to Top State Court

Franken Picks Up 87 Votes in Minn. Race

Coleman Willing to Continue Minn. Election Battle

Franken Moves to Dismiss Coleman Lawsuit


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne