Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


22

CBO: Dems' Health Plans Will Raise Costs

'Maybe what he should do is run for Congress,' snaps Reid

Share

(Newser) – The health care reform bills being pushed by House Democrats and the Senate health panel would not cut costs as advertised, says the director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. In fact, Douglas Elmendorf believes they would raise costs, the Washington Post reports. “We do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending," Elmendorf told the Senate budget panel. "On the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for health care costs.”

Republicans embraced his remarks, but they drew rebukes from Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, notes the New York Times. "Maybe what he should do is run for Congress," said Reid. Elmendorf specifically backed the idea of taxing employer-provided benefits, and Max Baucus—whose Senate finance panel is still working on its bill—expressed frustration that Obama has effectively taken that off the table. "Basically the president is not helping," Baucus said. "He does not want the exclusion, and that's making it difficult."

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont.   (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)
Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf.
Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.   (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
22 comments
VIEWING:
 
Newser001
Jul 16, 09 5:54 PM CDT
Raise costs...?!! We can exceed 30% per annum incremental cost increases...?!! There have to be fundamental changes EVERYWHERE, Mr. Elmendorf. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Newser001
Jul 16, 09 7:23 PM CDT
We pay 50% more per capita for healthcare than the next Western Nation, which also happens to have a National Healthcare program in place - I doubt we'll do any better, by simply avoiding the problem, doing absolutely nothing, and catering to the industry.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
Fondue
Jul 16, 09 6:01 PM CDT
Bottom line, Baucus is not going to get what he wants, and should know that. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Doctor_Zaius
Jul 16, 09 6:10 PM CDT
Yes because a public health plan has been so expensive in all the other countries it has been tried in. Bullshit. We pay the most money as a % of our GDP than any other industrialized country on the planet and we are the only ones who don't cover everyone. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
Nwambe
Jul 16, 09 6:23 PM CDT
Zaius, I have found that really strange. But bear in mind, of the G8, I believe that the US is the most populous, and so it makes sense that healthcare would be fraught with difficulties. That being said, I strongly encourage any Americans who read this to come to Canada and ask people on the street what they think of our healthcare system. Yes, Canadian healthcare has flaws, and yes, some of them are systemic and serious as a result of an aging population and shrinking GDP from baby boomers, but I think that Americans should make their decisions based on speaking with people in real life and finding out what they think.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.