Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
35

Health Care by Computer Has Failed in the UK

Share

(Newser) – Like all liberals, President Obama likes big, controlling systems. Like British politicians, he hopes to manage health care with a nationwide supercomputer. As Britain failed, so too will the United States, Fraser Nelson and Irwin M. Stelzer write in the Weekly Standard. Not only has Britain's medical database failed after years of hard work and $7.4 billion in taxpayers' money, it manages patients' health care in horrifying ways.

Want an expensive drug to arrest macular degeneration? Until recently, Britons first had to be blind in one eye. Already paying for life-prolonging cancer drugs? British health care won't have anything to do with you. It's a rationing system that has led to an equally messy computer system that fails to replace doctors' good sense. Britain's failure contains "a lesson for the world," write Nelsona and Stelzer: "Abandon hope all ye who enter here."

President Barack Obama.
President Barack Obama.   (AP Photo)
Nurses check terminals in an array of computers.
Nurses check terminals in an array of computers.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It was then, and is now, too big too succeed. Even for a supposedly homogenized medical system like Britain's NHS, there are too many variables. - Fraser Nelson and Irwin M. Stelzer,
the Weekly Standard

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
35 comments
VIEWING:
 
Nwambe
Jul 18, 09 6:55 PM CDT
Right, but the HMOs denial of treatment and insurance company lobbying is SO much safer? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+11
IN RESPONSE:
NewserScooter
Jul 19, 09 12:43 AM CDT
Usually having a human at an Ins. co. to deal with is better then a computer. IF you have the right information, I have never been denied from an Ins. co. Annoying yes, but try that with a federal agency.
Vote up! Vote down!
-5
IN RESPONSE:
JonmarkP
Jul 19, 09 2:10 AM CDT
Hmm... competent Federal agency. Social Security knows how much money I have contributed, to the penny. The IRS seems to get the taxes counted accurately, except for wealthy campaign contributors and the idle rich. NASA seems to be able to get people to the moon and back, and build Mars landers that are still working many years after the expiration date. I'll take a faceless Federal bureaucrat making my healthcare coverage decisions ANY DAY over an insurance-company tool who gets paid based on how many claims he can deny. I suspect you may be a fool.
Vote up! Vote down!
+10
IN RESPONSE:
lindamae
Jul 21, 09 2:23 AM CDT
At least you are allowed to live.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
cornelison
Jul 18, 09 7:13 PM CDT
In Canada EVERYBODY is covered. That's why there may be long waits in emergency rooms. No one tells me which doctor I HAVE to go to. The govt. here doesn't ration health procedures. It's up to you & your doctor to decide. All I have to do is show my health card & my taxes pay for everything. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+10
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.