Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


38

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Will Get Senate Hearing

Senate committee to examine consequences of military's gay policy

Share

(Newser) – The Senate Armed Services Committee will convene a fall hearing to examine the US military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy governing gay service members, the Albany Times Union reports. Chairman Carl Levin agreed to hold the hearings at the encouragement of New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who has been pushing to tack an 18-month stay in homosexual dismissals onto an upcoming defense spending bill.

Gillibrand pushed for the hearing after failing to find adequate support for the stay. “This policy is wrong for our national security and wrong for the moral foundation upon which our country was founded,” she says. “Numerous military leaders are telling us that the times have changed. ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ is an unfair, outdated measure that violates the civil rights of some of our bravest, most heroic men and women.”

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY, listens to testimony on Capitol Hill in Washington during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY, listens to testimony on Capitol Hill in Washington during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.   (AP Photo)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY, left, speaks to gathered faculty at Santo Domingo Autonomous University, in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, July 3, 2009.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-NY, left, speaks to gathered faculty at Santo Domingo Autonomous University, in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, July 3, 2009.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
38 comments
VIEWING:
 
long7000
Jul 27, 09 3:06 PM CDT
As an active duty military member, I don't care about your sexual orientation. It's not a force multiplier to be gay or straight. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+10
IN RESPONSE:
Mad
Jul 27, 09 6:10 PM CDT
Right on, Shipmate! (USN/Ret)
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Unaffiliated
Jul 27, 09 3:11 PM CDT
What does that have to do with this policy hearing?
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
kyleleitch
Jul 27, 09 3:13 PM CDT
Well, Corona_king, everyone other than you is just a fascist, aren't they? It seems like every time someone tries to do something good for this country that you don't like, you begin spouting your 'liberal fascist' rhetoric.
Vote up! Vote down!
+7
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 27, 09 3:42 PM CDT
See? Everything that you wrote is true: she is swinging wide for re-election, but you lose the impact with the lfwd thing. But, Liberal Fanatics might be a very good term indeed. It connotes your point and it is based in sound diction. Plus, it is actually more of a pejorative because fascist with its common meaning cancels out liberal, but fanatic with it's equally strong meaning intensities the word liberal.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.