Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
33

Learn From FDR, Obama, and Show Some Backbone

Roosevelt biographer says president needs to block out GOP

Share

(Newser) – As President Obama prepares to pull away from a public health care option, it shows not just that he's giving in to his opponents, writes Jean Edward Smith; worse, it "suggests that the Democratic Party has forgotten how to govern." In an op-ed for the New York Times, the FDR biographer writes that Roosevelt and his Democratic majorities passed the bulk of the New Deal over vociferous opposition. "Majority rule, as Roosevelt saw it, did not require his opponents’ permission," he writes.

"Roosevelt was a divider, not a uniter," Smith writes approvingly. FDR never called in Wall Street bankers before creating the SEC or signing the Glass-Steagall regulations; instead, he made sure he had the support of the American majority and ignored the "economic royalists" at the top. Roosevelt's greatness lay in an understanding that "governing involved choice and that choice engendered dissent"—a lesson Obama would be wise to learn.

President Barack Obama listens to a question as he speaks about health care during a town hall meeting at Central High School in Grand Junction, Colo. Saturday, Aug. 15, 2009.
President Barack Obama listens to a question as he speaks about health care during a town hall meeting at Central High School in Grand Junction, Colo. Saturday, Aug. 15, 2009.   (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
President Franklin D. Roosevelt at his desk at the White House, May 7, 1933.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt at his desk at the White House, May 7, 1933.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

FDR sought consensus among his fellow Democrats, which is why he sometimes kowtowed to the Southern oligarchs who chaired Congressional committees. But his Republican opponents were relegated to the political equivalent of Siberia.
-

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
33 comments
VIEWING:
 
Timinator2K
Sep 3, 09 7:30 AM CDT
Yes, show some FDR-like backbone and get us into a major shooting war with another major player. Riiight. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-17
IN RESPONSE:
nick
Sep 3, 09 7:50 AM CDT
It is now time for Obama to get tough. He should pull a George W. Bush style tactic on the naysayers: Tell them what he will accept, and that it's my way or the highway. After all, the Republicans thought that was great the last 8 years. Riiight ... back at you.
Vote up! Vote down!
+12
IN RESPONSE:
IndependentThinker
Sep 3, 09 11:19 AM CDT
How is Obama going to get us into another shooting war?
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
LiberalJesus
Sep 3, 09 11:59 AM CDT
How stupid can you really be Tim? Does your lack of historical facts trump your overall lack of intelligence because the more you speak, the less faith I have that you can actually be engaged in any debate that requires even a modicum of factual evidence while leaving the baseless drama and personal hatred behind. Please correct me if I am wrong, but from your pithy ineffectual comment, I am surmising that you think FDR went to war on a whim. I guess Goosetepping and sushi is more to your liking.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
acerbus80
Sep 3, 09 7:53 AM CDT
Right, because that's what makes a good president and leader...ignoring the majority of your populace's dissent and just doing what you want to do. Doesn't sound like much of a democracy to me. Jean Edward Smith is an idiot. I'm sure if the situation was reversed and W. or another conservative were in office with similar circumstances Jean would be urging the president to listen to the people instead. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-8
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.