Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


24

Obama Story Turns Out to Be (Partially) False

Patient was dropped by insurer, but fought back, and got treatment

Share

(Newser) – One of the most poignant passages from Barack Obama's recent address to Congress concerned an Illinois cancer patient who died, the president said, because his insurer dropped him after discovering an unreported gallstone. In fact, reports the Wall Street Journal, Otto Raddatz did have his coverage rescinded in 2005—but with the help of the Illinois attorney general, his family got it reinstated within three weeks, and he obtained the critical stem-cell transplant he needed. Raddatz died this year, four years after the showdown.

Raddatz's sister testified before Congress this spring, saying that he eventually did receive treatment. The error in Obama's speech may derive from a report by Slate writer Timothy Noah, who incorrectly wrote that "The delay in treatment eliminated Raddatz's chances of recovery, and he died." Rep. Jan Schakowsky, who serves on the subcommittee that investigated the case, said the president's aides should have been more careful but added: "To focus on that is kind of a 'gotcha.'"

President Barack Obama speaks to a joint session of Congress on health care at the US Capitol in Washington, on Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2009.
President Barack Obama speaks to a joint session of Congress on health care at the US Capitol in Washington, on Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2009.   (AP Photo/Jason Reed, pool)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

One man from Illinois lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found that he hadn't reported gallstones that he didn't even know about. They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it. - Barack Obama, in an address to Congress

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
24 comments
VIEWING:
 
godawgs
Sep 17, 09 9:03 AM CDT
First off the guy shouldn't have been dropped from his coverage, and it is sad that he died. That being said if the President is going to use him as a talking point in his speech in today's information age, his speechwriters should have checked the whole story twice. I bet you somebody is getting their ass chewed this morning. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+19
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Sep 17, 09 9:06 AM CDT
You're right godawgs. Oversight aside, Raddatz should have never been dropped. That's the point of reform and possibly why the story was included in the speech. But that is just a guess.
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
dontlikenobody
Sep 17, 09 9:06 AM CDT
This was definitely a chewable offense for a fact-checker.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
shonangreg
Sep 17, 09 9:08 AM CDT
Totally fair and relevant comment, godawgs. Not that you don't usually do so, but I just imagine some will try and make a big deal out of this.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
odowd80
Sep 17, 09 9:24 AM CDT
Absolutely right godawgs. However, the story was not told to paint an unfair, untrue picture of the health insurance industry. Stuff like this happens all the time. So had they done their homework, they would have easily found an equally heartbreaking replacement.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.