Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


19

Gizmos' Energy Draw Alarms Experts

Electronic gadgets consume 15% of household energy

Share

(Newser) – All around the house, electronic gadgets are blinking, buzzing, computing—and drawing on an immense amount of energy, the New York Times reports. Worldwide, they take up 15% of household power, and will likely consume three times as much by 2029, making it harder to combat global warming. Two hundred and thirty nuclear plants would be needed to fuel that demand, the International Energy Agency says.

Most experts say regulations are needed to limit gadgets' energy draw, but manufacturers have resisted such mandates. A federal attempt to limit the power draw of TVs—flat-screens are the biggest energy offender—died in the 1990s due to industry opposition. But Congress has done it before, limiting the energy use of appliances like refrigerators and washers. “Standards are one of the few ways to cheaply go after big chunks of energy savings,” one advocate says.

Electronic gadgets like cell phones, computers, and flat-screen televisions are drawing an enormous amount of energy.
Electronic gadgets like cell phones, computers, and flat-screen televisions are drawing an enormous amount of energy.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
19 comments
VIEWING:
 
dontlikeyou
Sep 19, 09 9:56 PM CDT
I don't believe that figure of 15% for a second. Talk to anyone who knows electricity.... phone chargers pull only a slight, tiny amount of electricity. It is your air/heat, your water heater, oven/stove and washer/dryer which accounts for over 90% of electricity usage. Honestly, I wonder about the intelligence of liberal tree huggers when I find their priorities are so f**king far off base almost all of the time. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-6
IN RESPONSE:
dontlikeyou
Sep 19, 09 9:58 PM CDT
Case in point--- tree huggers told us we MUST switch to fluorescent bulbs. They failed to tell us that fluorescent bulbs contain mercury, a deadly poison. What are we going to do when our landfills start receiving 200 times the amount of discarded fluorescent bulbs containing deadly mercury? Eh? They didn't tell you about that when they passed that assinine law to get rid of incandescent bulbs, did they? Morons!
Vote up! Vote down!
-6
IN RESPONSE:
Todd_English
Sep 19, 09 11:00 PM CDT
no one likes you.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
WallyEFunk
Sep 20, 09 8:36 AM CDT
I'm was looking into the fluorescent bulbs, mercury content, etc. Found a coal fire electrity plant. figures, that using them in there area.put less murcury into the environment out then burning coal does if U use regular bulbs. and having to build two hundred and thirty nuclear plants. doesn't sound good, with the waste they make. Why are so many governments forcing change to fluorescent bulbs, If there that bad ?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
WallyEFunk
Sep 20, 09 8:43 AM CDT
Then READING the article,unlike some PPL. It doesn't just say phone charges. "electronic gadgets are blinking, buzzing, computing." SO tks dontlikeyou for giving the figure of 90 % for most. So he's saying 10 % for the "electronic gadgets are blinking, buzzing, computing" NOT the 15 % .Honestly, I wonder about the intelligence of .....
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.