DOJ Knocks Down 'Net Neutrality'

Says ISPs should be able to charge consumers more for priority traffic

By Zach Samalin, Newser Staff

Posted Sep 6, 2007 8:35 PM CDT

(Newser) – Internet service providers should be able to charge a premium for customers who want certain content to load faster than others, the Justice Department said today. In a recommendation to the FCC, Justice claimed "net neutrality"—the idea that all websites should be equally accessible—could slow online growth, keep ISPs from upgrading services and stick consumers with unnecessary costs.

"Whether the same type of differentiated products and services will develop on the Internet should be determined by market forces, not regulatory intervention," the agency said, citing the Postal Service's tiered rates for varying deliveries. Net neutrality supporters said that ISPs such as Verizon and AT&T could use the ruling to discriminate against certain websites and services.

[Images (3)]

[Videos (1)]

Buildings on Market Street are seen reflected in a Verizon sign in Philadelphia, in this April 30, 2007 file photo. Cable providers such as Verizon, AT&T and Comcast have been seeking the ability to charge... (Associated Press)

The Justice Department decreed that Net Neutrality could potentially hamper the internet's growth both as a technology and a marketplace, although many fear the ruling will ultimately cost consumers. (Shutterstock.com)

In a defeat to the movement hoping to preserve Net Neutrality, the Justice Department has granted internet service providers permission to charge fees based on individual web usage. (Shutterstock.com)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

2008 Democratic Presidential hopeful John Edwards addresses Net Neutrality. (Politicstv (YouTube))

View larger videos >>

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »

To report an error on this story, notify our editors.

More Newser Stories

Court Smacks Down FCC in Net Neutrality Case

Agency had no standing to regulate Comcast, 3-judge panel rules

(NEWSER) - A federal court today said the FCC does not have the power to force Internet service providers to treat all traffic equally. The ruling, in a closely watched case concerning Comcast's ban on BitTorrent, is a blow to the Obama administration’s crusade for net neutrality. But the FCC failed to show that regulating ISPs falls within “its statutorily mandated responsibilities,” a three-judge appeals court panel ruled. More»

FCC Ready to Defend Net Neutrality

Agency says it will step in to stop ISPs from blocking access

(NEWSER) - FCC boss Kevin Martin told a hearing yesterday that the government was "ready, willing, and able to step in" to stop Internet service providers from restricting traffic sent by rivals, the Wall Street Journal reports. Comcast is accused of acting improperly by slowing or blocking access to file-sharing sites. The cable giant says it is merely managing its network. More»

FCC Poised to Pass Net Neutrality Rules

'Fake' neutrality plan doesn't go far enough, critics say

(AP) - New rules aimed at prohibiting broadband providers from becoming gatekeepers of Internet traffic now have just enough votes to pass the Federal Communications Commission today. The new "net neutrality" rules would prohibit phone and cable companies from abusing their control over broadband connections to discriminate against rival content or services, such as Internet phone calls or online video, or play favorites with Web traffic. More»

FCC Chair Pushes to Regulate ISPs

Proposal might amount to net neutrality order

(NEWSER) - FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is making yet another valiant stab at introducing net neutrality or something like it today. In a speech today, Genachowski will propose a new regulatory framework that would forbid Internet broadband providers from blocking lawful content, the New York Times reports. The rules would also allow providers to charge different rates for different levels of service, and to manage traffic to limit congestion or harmful traffic. More»

We Might Need Google Neutrality, Too

Net Neutrality isn't a cure-all; the internet is full of choke points

(NEWSER) - Net neutrality is back in the headlines, but it might not be as important as its champions might hope. Essentially, the net neutrality fight is over price discrimination—the ISPs want to charge extra fees to big companies that could afford to pay them, explains Ars Technica . Companies of all sorts practice price discrimination, and it works out well—unless the public finds out and gets offended. More»

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS

What is Newser?

Face it: there's too much news. At Newser, we choose the most thought-provoking and entertaining stories from hundreds of US and international sources and reduce them to a headline, picture, and two paragraphs. And we do it 24/7—you can come back morning, noon, night (and in between) for something new that matters. Read less, know more.

Learn more »

Partnering with: Slate

View Newser on the mobile website

DOJ Knocks Down 'Net Neutrality'