Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


9

Supreme Court to Hear Enron CEO's Appeal

Jeff Skilling challenges 'honest services' law, says trial was unfair

Share

(Newser) – The Supreme Court has agreed to hear former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling’s appeal of his fraud conviction in connection with the company's collapse. The appeal argues that the federal “honest services” statute, a favorite for prosecutors tackling white collar criminals, is flawed because the government needn’t prove that the defendant’s actions were for his own personal gain. Conrad Black was brought down with the same law, and the Court earlier agreed to hear his appeal, too.

Skilling also contends that he wasn’t given a fair trial, because the people of Houston were out for blood after Enron’s collapse. If the Court agrees, Skilling will probably get a new trial. A lower appeals court upheld all 19 counts of his conviction, but is considering reducing his 24-year prison sentence. Prosecutors, naturally, contend the trial was fair—and that there was overwhelming evidence behind Skilling’s conviction.

Former Enron executive Jeff Skilling leave the courthouse after the verdict in his fraud and conspiracy trial in this May 25, 2006 file photo in Houston.
Former Enron executive Jeff Skilling leave the courthouse after the verdict in his fraud and conspiracy trial in this May 25, 2006 file photo in Houston.   (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan, file)
Former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling leaves the federal courthouse in Houston Wednesday, Aug. 11, 2004.
Former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling leaves the federal courthouse in Houston Wednesday, Aug. 11, 2004.   (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
9 comments
VIEWING:
 
zik
Oct 13, 09 10:12 AM CDT
Guilty is Guilty... its a waste of resources to have a new trial unless there is a reason to believe that there would be a different result... The moral victory is important, and may be able to protect others, but can't the court just say, yeah the prosecutors screwed up, but were still right? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
myvoice
Oct 13, 09 11:20 AM CDT
All the supreme court decides is if the case was constitutional. So if prosecutors did do something that took away from Skillings civil liberties i.e. unconstitutional , the Supreme court can vote for a new trial.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Snarfeh
Oct 13, 09 11:20 AM CDT
Waterboard him. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
schmidtkoff
Oct 13, 09 11:33 AM CDT
skilling - what a pig. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
schmidtkoff
Oct 13, 09 11:37 AM CDT
actually i take that back. pigs are intelligent animals. and should not be likened to skilling - so let's go with slugs who leave a trail of slime in their passing.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.