Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 GLOSSIES 
9

Dog Fighting, Football Share Brutal Similarities

We despise one and love the other. But willful injury is inherent to both

Share

(Newser) – Malcolm Gladwell is serious when he asks the question, in the New Yorker, whether football is really any different from dog fighting. He doesn't just mean that both inflict grievous injury to combatants—though the brain damage sustained by football linemen takes considerably longer to kill them—but that there are troubling similarities between the "gameness" the dogs are prized for, "the desire to please an owner at any expense to themselves," and the gameness that sends players back onto the field despite concussions and other injuries.

Gladwell reviews the science of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, the progressive neurological disorder that looks like Alzheimer's but is caused by the constant trauma to football players' brains—repetitive blows comparable to a head-on collision a thousand times a season. Football is unlike other sports—except dog fighting—he notes, in that injury is inherent to the sport, not an occasional accident or abuse of the rules, but part of play itself. "What football must confront, in the end, is not just the problem of injuries," he writes. "It is the fact that there is something profoundly awry in the relationship between the players and the game."

Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Chad Ochocinco's helmet pops free after being hit by Baltimore Ravens cornerback Fabian Washington, left, and linebacker Ray Lewis.
Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Chad Ochocinco's helmet pops free after being hit by Baltimore Ravens cornerback Fabian Washington, left, and linebacker Ray Lewis.   (AP Photo/Nick Wass)
Detroit Lions wide receiver Calvin Johnson, bottom, is tackled by Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrison.
Detroit Lions wide receiver Calvin Johnson, bottom, is tackled by Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrison.   (AP Photo/Duane Burleson)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
9 comments
VIEWING:
 
riffran
Oct 13, 09 5:15 PM CDT
besides Vick? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-6
Forderon
Oct 13, 09 5:29 PM CDT
Thoughtful response. Did you bother reading the article, or even the summary? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
thejanet
Oct 13, 09 5:36 PM CDT
The main difference, to me, is that football players are generally there because they want to be playing, it's a voluntary game. The dogs have no voice. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
ballen28
Oct 13, 09 6:46 PM CDT
Agreed. Want to be there, get paid to be there, don't get killed when they lose.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
DJM420
Oct 14, 09 1:07 AM CDT
i would argue that many of these young men dont have a choice. there are surely some of these guys who, if not for football scholarships, would be poor as dirt, maybe slinging crack even. so yes, they 'choose' to be there, but im sure at least some thought "what choice do i have to get my family out of this hell hole? if i dont play football, i dont have shit" so imagine some play hurt throughout their entire careers from high school on, if not younger. maybe the problem is actually the emphasis our educational institutions put on athletics versus actual education. funny, the series 'friday night lights' is a great primer on the topic...
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.