Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


8

California Says Bank Fleeced Pension Funds

State seeks $200M from State Street Bank of Boston

Share

(Newser) – California sued a Boston bank today and accused it of ripping off $56.6 million from two state pension funds. It wants all that money back, plus another $150 million in penalties. Attorney General Jerry Brown accused State Street Bank of "unconscionable fraud" and called it "just the latest example of how clever financial traders violate laws and rip off the public trust."

Brown says State Street overcharged the pension funds over eight years while conducting currency trades, reports the LA Times. It would set its fee based on the highest exchange rate of the day, not at the time of transaction—and pocket the difference. A bank spokesman denied any wrongdoing.

California Attorney Jerry Brown announces a lawsuit against State Street Bank and Trust on Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2009, in Oakland, Calif.
California Attorney Jerry Brown announces a lawsuit against State Street Bank and Trust on Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2009, in Oakland, Calif.   (AP Photo/Noah Berger)
California Attorney Jerry Brown announces a lawsuit against State Street Bank and Trust on Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2009, in Oakland, Calif.
California Attorney Jerry Brown announces a lawsuit against State Street Bank and Trust on Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2009, in Oakland, Calif.   (AP Photo/Noah Berger)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
8 comments
VIEWING:
 
Jayster999
Oct 20, 09 5:17 PM CDT
Good luck getting it back. The banksters are mighty good at hiding ill-gotten assets. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Netstorm2k9
Oct 21, 09 2:55 AM CDT
Wow. At least two of the banking elites read Newser and thumbed you down, Jay. Wow.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Yourself
Oct 20, 09 5:18 PM CDT
this is what happens when you deregulate too much. banks wind up doing whatever the hell they want and then they deny any wrongdoing. They're legally right that they didn't do anything wrong, since the laws got deregulated. This people, is why we have rules and checks and balances in our fiscal system. it's not rocket science! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
Thinker
Oct 20, 09 5:32 PM CDT
Why we SHOULD have rules and checks and balances brought back!
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
SemperFI
Oct 20, 09 5:32 PM CDT
Really. How suprising. Now the bank is going to run to their buddy on the hill. And cry "poor mouth" And of course. They deny any wrongdoing. Typical lawyer speak. DENY....DENY....DENY Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.