Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
17

White House Move Bad News for Investors

It's trying to weaken protections put in place after Enron

Share

(Newser) – Belying its reputation as financial regulatory crusaders, the White House is quietly working to weaken a protection for everyday investors. Rahm Emanuel is pushing lawmakers to back an amendment that would exempt smaller companies from audits of their internal controls, sources tell the Huffington Post. The stricter controls, established by Sarbanes-Oxley after the Enron scandal, are scheduled to kick in next year for companies with market caps under $75 million.

Emanuel is reportedly arguing that the small companies aren’t the ones causing the problems, and that by nixing the requirements Democrats could paint themselves as small-business heroes. But critics counter that the measure affects more than half of all publicly-traded companies—"They're not mom and pop shops," says one—and is important to individual investors. “This is something the Republicans could never have accomplished,” says one ex-SEC chief. “It makes a mockery of what the Democratic Party has always stood for—individual investors.”

Barack Obama meets with his Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Nov. 2, 2009, in the White House. Sitting behind him are Rahm Emanuel, left, and Valerie Jarrett.
Barack Obama meets with his Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Nov. 2, 2009, in the White House. Sitting behind him are Rahm Emanuel, left, and Valerie Jarrett.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, left, and Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag, right, walk in the Capitol in this file photo.
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, left, and Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag, right, walk in the Capitol in this file photo.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
17 comments
VIEWING:
 
Face-Of-RNC
Nov 3, 09 11:27 AM CST
OK, could someone not from the tin foil hat party tell me what's going on here? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
hybrid
Nov 3, 09 11:44 AM CST
this is just an accounting issue, allowing small buisness to operate more freely. What rahm is forgeting is that these companies are traded publicly and need to be regulated or you not only could end up enron but with a dot com involving small banks and buisness inflating their numbers to encourge investment thus injecting large cap into small under reg companies. It should be if you trade "publicly" you should open your books for the public
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
IN RESPONSE:
Face-Of-RNC
Nov 3, 09 11:49 AM CST
So, in order to gain political stroke, Obama is telling smaller businesses they can bait and switch and juggle the books with impunity?
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
hybrid
Nov 3, 09 11:51 AM CST
well this could be spun alot og ways, one is to allow this small cap companies to ipo a new debt offering and gain needed capital, or its strickly pandering , your call on what you think Rahm is like.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
davjc09
Nov 3, 09 11:57 AM CST
I don't pretend to know much about the matter, so maybe somebody can help me. I don't see how exempting the "small businesses" helps them in anyway. I feel that in the long run those with good books will fare better than those with bad books. So who are we really helping with this policy?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.