Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

There's Nothing Wrong With Retouching

Nothing, as long as you view it as art

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Aug 30, 2010 12:10 PM CDT | Updated Sep 4, 2010 12:37 PM CDT

(Newser) – We love to hate retouched photos (click here, here, or here for evidence)—but why? We claim to be concerned about the self-esteem of young girls who might be influenced by these unrealistic pictures, but the truth is, "the endless cavalcade of before-and-after shots is an outgrowth of the voyeurism, gossipmongering, and schadenfreude that fuel our celebrity industrial complex," writes Amanda Fortini in New York. Because we want to see stars "in all their wrinkled, full-figured glory," websites and magazines keep making a big deal about these images.

The truth is that few adults take photos like these seriously—nor should we. "Glamour creation" is an "age-old game," and Photoshopped magazine spreads are hardly different from the illustrations of centuries past, which portrayed their subjects "as idealized versions of themselves." We should simply accept "a retouched photo for what it is: an open fiction, a candid fantasy," Fortini suggests. "The problem isn’t altered photographs; it’s our failure to alter our expectations of them."

See? Even normal people can get retouched.
See? Even "normal" people can get retouched.   (PRNewsFoto/PicWash)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
8%
7%
18%
2%
61%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 27 comments
bec215
Sep 6, 2010 10:52 AM CDT
Retouching isn't the issue - it's re-modeling to the extent you put someone's head on a different body (done on multiple magazine covers!), subtract or add 20 pounds to make someone who's anorexic-thin look healthy or someone who's curvy look stick-thin, make someone's limbs and neck longer, change the color and style of the hair, re-color the eyes (e.g., all those startling blue eyes we see on headshots), etc. etc. See for example the Ralph Lauren ad that was remodeled to the point of absurdity. _http://shine.yahoo.com/event/fallbeauty/image-of-ultra-thin-ralph-lauren-model-sparks-outrage-521480/ At a certain point, it's no longer a photo - it's artwork, but it's not labeled as such.
j e f
Aug 31, 2010 6:52 PM CDT
Lousy supporting image. She looks like shit in both pics. She ain't what they're talking about
myflap.blow
Aug 30, 2010 10:38 PM CDT
Sorry, thought it was another catholic priest article... Title got me again!
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne