Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Soda Tax Makes Good Sense

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted May 20, 2009 10:49 AM CDT

(Newser) – The soda tax is a great idea, and its probable death at the hands of lobbyists serves to highlight all the problems with our tax system, writes David Leonhardt in the New York Times. The current system doesn’t raise enough money, and it’s “complex in all the wrong ways,” a vast labyrinth of deductions, subsidies, and extra taxes devoid of logic.

We should be taxing activities that place a cost on the rest of society. That discourages that activity, and helps cover the costs of troubles that persist. Soaring soda consumption—it’s more than doubled since the 1970s—has unquestionably contributed to the obesity epidemic, contributing to costly health issues like diabetes. Soda should be taxed. Instead? The US gives subsidies to corn syrup.

Coca-Cola on display in San Jose, Calif.
Coca-Cola on display in San Jose, Calif.   (AP Photo)
Bottles of Pepsi Ice Cucumber are on display at a convenience store in Tokyo Wednesday, June 13, 2007.
Bottles of Pepsi Ice Cucumber are on display at a convenience store in Tokyo Wednesday, June 13, 2007.   (AP Photo/Junji Kurokawa)
A selection of sodas Auburn University researcher Leonard Bell and another colleague studied while conducting a study on caffeine content in sodas.
A selection of sodas Auburn University researcher Leonard Bell and another colleague studied while conducting a study on caffeine content in sodas.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Sugar, rum and tobacco are commodities which are nowhere necessaries of life, which are become objects of almost universal consumption, and which are therefore extremely proper subjects of taxation. - Adam Smith

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 22 comments
kokuaguy
May 21, 2009 3:51 AM CDT
Are you terminally obtuse, Timie, or simply choosing to ignore the point of the tax, which is to assess a cost on those who consume harmfuil sugar laden "luxury" items like soda, which contribute to everything from tooth decay to the obesity epidemic to Type II Diabetes? Now, please address the following: the giant soft drink companies are directly subsidized by the U. S. Dept. of Agriculture's and DHS regulations which allow FOOD STAMPS to be used to purchase soft drinks. Shouldn't food stamps be limited to items that provide a certain amount of nutrition without contiubuting to obesity, etc?
kokuaguy
May 21, 2009 3:37 AM CDT
The logic would say that we only tax those bubbly caffeine delivering beverages that do not harm one's health and increase the costs of healthcare for the society as a whole. So, perhaps diet coke would remain untaxed... unless the artificial sweetener is shown to be harmful.
kokuaguy
May 21, 2009 3:33 AM CDT
And how about a tax on those dad-blamed kids that won't stay the hell off my lawn !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne