Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


24

Rural States Would Gain Most From Health Reform...

...but their vehement residents want it least

Share

(Newser) – With some of the highest percentages of uninsured citizens, rural states like Wyoming and Iowa stand to benefit the most from health care reform—but they’re also home to its most vocal detractors, the Los Angeles Times reports. Such states tend to have lower personal incomes, more small businesses that don't offer insurance to employees, fewer private insurance options, and stricter Medicaid cutoffs, so it’s no wonder their senators are aggressively brokering a reform compromise.

If town halls are any indication, their constituents aren't happy about it, but one advocate says health care isn’t really the issue: “They're angry with their economic situation,” he insists. "When we shift to health care, there's a lot less noise and a lot more questions." Still, it might be an uphill battle, as more centralized health care "runs counter to perhaps the rugged individualism on which America is built,” an observer says.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, answers a question from Sheryl Prather during a town meeting on health care reform Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009 in Adel, Iowa.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, answers a question from Sheryl Prather during a town meeting on health care reform Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009 in Adel, Iowa.   (AP Photo/Steve Pope)
Sen. Michael Enzi, R-Wyo, says any health care legislation must lower medical costs for Americans without increasing deficits and the national debt.
Sen. Michael Enzi, R-Wyo, says any health care legislation must lower medical costs for Americans without increasing deficits and the national debt.   (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson, File)
Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wy., holds up a copy of a health care bill as he answers questions during a health care town hall meeting in Kenner, La., Friday, Aug. 28, 2009.
Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wy., holds up a copy of a health care bill as he answers questions during a health care town hall meeting in Kenner, La., Friday, Aug. 28, 2009.   (AP Photo/Cheryl Gerber)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
24 comments
VIEWING:
 
2-bits
Sep 2, 09 10:55 AM CDT
If people voted in their own interest, the democrats would probably win every time. If people voted with their heads, however, we wouldn't be stuck with this stupid two party system. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+12
IN RESPONSE:
Doctor_Zaius
Sep 2, 09 11:14 AM CDT
Stockholm syndrome.
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
IN RESPONSE:
Forderon
Sep 2, 09 12:11 PM CDT
Pretty sure Stockholm syndrome doesn't apply here Doc.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
odowd80
Sep 2, 09 1:08 PM CDT
Actually, Stockholm syndrome fits here like a glove. Republicans kidnap the country with neocon ideology, screw its citizens, and the victims turn to the Republicans for help.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Forderon
Sep 2, 09 1:19 PM CDT
Well it's more of a metaphor in that case
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.