Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

'Green China' Marks Sputnik of 21st Century

US ignores race for clean energy at its own peril: Friedman

By Polly Davis Doig,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 27, 2009 11:55 AM CDT

(Newser) – For those who think the past year will be defined by global recession, Tom Friedman says think again. Rather, for the New York Times columnist it is Red China's decision "to become Green China" that will spur a 21st-century technological race for clean energy—in the same way that Russia's launch of Sputnik belatedly prodded the US into the space race.

Choking from its own development, China is going green out of necessity, writes Friedman. And "watch out"—if the US fails to respond as it did in the '50s and '60s, "you will buy your next electric car, solar panels, batteries, and energy-efficiency software from China. It is the Sputnik of our day. We ignore it at our peril."

A worker monitors the production line of solar panels at a factory of Astronergy, a China based solar panel maker, in Hangzhou, in eastern China's Zhejiang province Wednesday Aug. 26, 2009.
A worker monitors the production line of solar panels at a factory of Astronergy, a China based solar panel maker, in Hangzhou, in eastern China's Zhejiang province Wednesday Aug. 26, 2009.   (AP Photo)
A worker shows products in a factory of Astronergy, a China based solar panel maker, in Hangzhou, in eastern China's Zhejiang province Wednesday Aug. 26, 2009.
A worker shows products in a factory of Astronergy, a China based solar panel maker, in Hangzhou, in eastern China's Zhejiang province Wednesday Aug. 26, 2009.   (AP Photo)
A solar panel is seen on top a subway station information pillar stand against the hazy skyline in Beijing, China, Wednesday, July 22, 2009.
A solar panel is seen on top a subway station information pillar stand against the hazy skyline in Beijing, China, Wednesday, July 22, 2009.   (AP Photo/Andy Wong)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It’s like Sputnik went up and we think it’s just a shooting star. Too many of our politicians are still trapped in their own dumb-as-we-wanna-be bubble, where we’re always No. 1 - Thomas Friedman

If they invest in 21st-century technologies and we invest in 20th-century technologies, they’ll win. If we both invest in 21st-century technologies, challenging each other,
we all win. - David Sandalow, assistant energy secretary for policy

China’s leaders know that even if climate change were a hoax, the demand for clean, renewable power is going to soar as we add an estimated 2.5 billion people to the planet by 2050. - Thomas Friedman

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 15 comments
riffran
Sep 28, 2009 10:51 AM CDT
forgot to add, at 10 gallons per minute that would get you about 14,400 gallons out in a 24 hour period without refilling, leaving a leeway of about 600 gallons...so enough solar panels to run a few pumps that could in aggregate pump more that 10 gal per minute, and add wind to that equasion, and it could work...but damn would it be expensive to set up
proud_prude
Sep 28, 2009 8:56 AM CDT
Friedrnan's hidden agenda is dishonest advocacy of nuclear power, holding up France as a rnodel for the U.S. His opinions here deserve little rnore respect than those on the Bush Adrninistration's invasion of Iraq. France's atomic power industry is a failed radioactive flame. Its 58 reactors are unpopular, unsafe, uneconomical, dirty, direct agents of global warming, weapons proliferators and major generators of atomic waste for which there is no management solution. But self-proclaimed "green advocate" Thomas Friedman seems to think otherwise. While Friedman and his moneyed elite continue to grasp at the failed, centralized straw of atomic energy, technology and history have passed them by. Harvey Wasserrnan, Senior Advisor to Greanpeace, U.S.A.
riffran
Sep 28, 2009 6:01 AM CDT
I would LOVE to go green and gridless, but dammit it is too expensive..The tech is out there, and has been out there for a long time, it is just the cost..I would love to get say...uh two 15,000 gallon tanks, one at ground level, and one at five feet or higher above the other one. fill the top one with water, and release it at a given rate via a water wheel to the bottom one, (there is the force to turn a generator), and have enough combined solar and wind powered pumps to recirculate the water back into the top one, as fast or faster than it's released....(it's a way to store the captured energy as "potential"...and have the top tank hold enough water to go a full 24 hours without filling...but try pricing what that would cost....over 100,000 easy

More Newser Stories

Okay, Okay, I Praise China Too Much

The Grass Isn't Greener in China

Worker Kills Himself Over AWOL iPhone 4G Prototype

Wallop Iran Where It Hurts: Oil Revenues

Stocks Bounce, Dow Up 150


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne