Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

How Reid Rescued the Public Option

Opt-out plan bridged divides in Dem caucus

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 27, 2009 5:29 AM CDT

(Newser) – The public health insurance plan was brought back from the brink of oblivion thanks to Harry Reid's swift adoption of an "opt-out" plan brought to his attention just three weeks ago. In backroom negotiations with members of the Democratic caucus, the majority leader found that the federal approach bridged the gap between conservative and liberals on the issue, roping in the 60 votes needed to break a Republican filibuster.

A plan allowing states to opt in to a national insurance program was discussed before Reid settled on the opt-out plan, which will be written into the final legislation rather than voted on in the Senate. "If you are at the point of supporting an opt-in then it is not much of a stretch to support an opt-out," an aide to Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer tells the Huffington Post. "But on a practical level it makes a world's worth of difference. It removes the barrier of creating a public option."

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., arrives at a news conference to speak on health care reform in Washington yesterday.
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., arrives at a news conference to speak on health care reform in Washington yesterday.   (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid speaks about health care reform during a news conference yesterday in Washington.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid speaks about health care reform during a news conference yesterday in Washington.   (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. gestures while speaking on health care reform during a news conference, Monday, Oct. 26, 2009, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. gestures while speaking on health care reform during a news conference, Monday, Oct. 26, 2009, on Capitol Hill in Washington.   (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It was a federalist approach. States become a laboratory. Some will chose one direction. Others another. This will allow members to go home and say 'no one, no state has have to be part of this if they don't want to.' - Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 15 comments
DontLikeYou___
Oct 28, 2009 2:04 AM CDT
Poverty for everyone because of government meddling in health care..... NO!!!!!
DontLikeYou___
Oct 28, 2009 2:03 AM CDT
What about our children who will be forced to pay increased taxes to support an over burdened, government funded program like this? Amtrak just came out today and the American tax payer subsidizes over 50% of every purchased ticket on Amtrak when that percentage was promised would never be more than 15%. Government never runs things efficiently. Their proposed numbers are always lower than what they turn out. This bill is suicide for our economy.
DontLikeYou___
Oct 28, 2009 2:01 AM CDT
Agreed.

More Newser Stories

Senate Rejects $35B Jobs Bill

Senate Dems Float 5% Millionaires' Tax

Harry Reid: House 'Having Trouble' on Debt Ceiling

No Debt Compromise in Sight

Senate Cancels July 4 Recess


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne