US Won't Demand Use of Force in UN Resolution

But White House will keep open possibility of strike on its own
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Sep 13, 2013 5:18 PM CDT
US Won't Demand Use of Force in UN Resolution
President Obama during a news conference in the East Room of the White House last month.   (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

The New York Times reports that the White House is bowing to reality: Because Russia will never agree to any UN resolution that calls for the possibility of military action against Syria, the US won't insist on such a clause. (The Russians already have balked at a draft proposal from France that mentions force.) President Obama, however, won't agree to remove the threat of force entirely, as Bashar al-Assad has demanded. The US will keep open the possibility of a military strike on its own, outside the UN, notes the Times. The development comes as John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov continue to hash out Moscow's plan to have Syria turn over its chemical weapons.

Though it's conceding on the use of force, the US will push for sanctions or similar penalties against Assad's regime if it fails to abide by the pending deal. Meanwhile, UN inspectors are expected to turn over their report on last month's attack near Damascus to UN chief Ban Ki-moon this weekend, reports Reuters. Today, the secretary-general said he is all but certain that inspectors will conclude what seems to be obvious already—that chemical weapons were indeed used on Aug. 21. But the report isn't expected to weigh in on which side actually used them. (More President Obama stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.