Stephanie Seymour Photos Aren't Incestuous

It's sad that we can't recognize maternal affection
By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff
Posted Jan 12, 2011 11:41 AM CST
Stephanie Seymour Photos With Son Peter Brant II Not Incestuous, so Stop Calling Them That, Begs Mary Elizabeth Williams
One of the more innocent snapshots of Stephanie Seymour and her son.   (YouTube)

The media is in a tizzy over the pictures of bikini-clad supermodel Stephanie Seymour frolicking on the beach with her “young, handsome, impeccably torsoed” … son. Immediately, websites and commenters alike were referring to their “incestuous” behavior, without stopping to consider that maybe Seymour was simply “engaging in innocent maternal affection,” writes Mary Elizabeth Williams on Salon, noting that Seymour was on a family vacation at the time—and the son in question is openly gay.

Peter Brant II has already shot back at critics, calling their embrace innocent. It’s sad, Williams concludes, that “even with America's bottomless appetite for skank, we possess some unbelievably repressed attitudes toward genuine physical affection. We'll Google ‘nip slip’ all the live-long day, but freak out at a son brushing a hand against the side of his mother's bathing suit top.” How many of us, she wonders, can even recognize genuine “familial warmth”? Yes, a teenager willing to embrace his mom is sadly rare—"but that doesn't automatically make it weird or gross or creepy.” Click for her whole piece, or to see one of the slightly more controversial photos.
(More Stephanie Seymour stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.