Draft Won’t Solve Army’s Problems

Report forecasts a less effective—and not any fairer—force
By Heather McPherson,  Newser User
Posted Jul 23, 2007 11:04 AM CDT
Draft Won’t Solve Army’s Problems
Airman Basic Amy Castro, from Hillsboro, Ore., demonstrates a firing position to other recruits prior to running the low crawl tactical course, part of the Air Force boot camp at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio Texas, Monday, July 16, 2007. Air Force boot camp used to open in a classroom with...   (Associated Press)

Despite calls for a draft to "fix"  the ailing US Army, it would be less efficient financially and less effective on the ground than the volunteer Army, a new study concludes. A Congressional Budget Office paper, reported in Time, says draftees make for less well-trained soldiers because they stay less time in uniform; training costs spike with the more-quickly revolving door.

Further, Americans without high school diplomas make poorer soldiers, the Army says, and the percentage of them pulled in by a draft would be higher. And the notion that  racial diversity would be better served with a draft is also disputed: the Army is in fact an accurate reflection of the population ethnically, and fatalities are disproportionately white, because minorities hold fewer combat positions.
(More Army recruiting stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X