Sandbar Plan Is Bad Science

At best, berms will do nothing to protect La. coastline
By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff
Posted Jun 10, 2010 4:45 PM CDT
Sandbar Plan Is Bad Science
A bulldozer moves sand to construct a berm on East Grand Terre Island, La. to provide a barrier against the Deepwater Horizon oil spill Tuesday, June 8, 2010.   (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

(Newser) – Bobby Jindal's plan to protect the Louisiana coastline with sandbars is more the product of political hysteria than pragmatic decision-making, Sharon Begley writes for Newsweek. Few coastal scientists think the berms—which will cost $360 million initially and need to be constantly rebuilt—will protect the wetlands from BP's oil.

story continues below

There is even a danger than the sandbars may block inlets that allow water to pass into the wetlands, disrupting its life processes: "You could kill the wetlands without the oil ever reaching them," says one coastal geologist. The plan will set a bad precedent, Begley notes: "BP’s oil will assault the gulf, and possibly the Atlantic, for years. Many more decisions that turn on science lie ahead."
(Read more Gulf oil spill stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.