We Need to Revisit All 'Shaken Baby' Convictions

Science is casting doubt on diagnosis
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Sep 21, 2010 10:10 AM CDT
Updated Sep 25, 2010 8:00 AM CDT

(Newser) – The medical community continues to find evidence that 'shaken baby syndrome' is too often diagnosed. The problem is that the legal community continues to convict and imprison parents and baby-sitters. "Increasingly, it appears that a good number of the people charged with and convicted of homicide may be innocent," writes law professor Deborah Tuerkheimer in the New York Times. She says it's time for a systematic review of all such convictions in the US, as Canada's Ontario province is already doing.

story continues below

"For decades, shaken baby syndrome has been, in essence, a medical diagnosis of murder," she writes. But doctors now know that the so-called "triad" of telltale symptoms ("retinal hemorrhages, bleeding around the brain, and brain swelling") can be caused in other ways. "Going forward, prosecutors, judges and juries should exercise greater skepticism. The triad of symptoms alone cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an infant has been fatally shaken." (Read more shaken baby syndrome stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.