X

Obama's Going Wrong Way With America's Nukes

US could spend $1T on modernization in 30 years: NY Times
By Matt Cantor,  Newser User
Posted Sep 23, 2014 10:57 AM CDT

(Newser) – President Obama has been a voice for nuclear disarmament, and his administration has taken steps toward that goal—but the White House's latest move takes the US in the opposite direction, a New York Times editorial observes. Obama is undertaking major improvements to US nuclear weapons and facilities, spending "tens of billions" in the process; at the same time, he has cut spending requests aimed at securing nuclear equipment worldwide at a time when the planet reportedly holds 16,300 nuclear weapons. "This is a shortsighted and disappointing turn," the Times notes.

In order to garner GOP support for the nuke-reducing New Start treaty with Russia, Obama agreed to add some $14 billion to the $70 billion already devoted to nuclear improvements. The real cost of the improvements, however, could reach some $355 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Other studies put the real cost at $1 trillion over 30 years, in what the Government Accountability Office finds is a "badly managed" modernization effort. "Investing in nuclear security protects Americans more than unwise investment in new nuclear weapons," the Times editors write; it's time for Congress—and the public—to engage with the issue. Click for the full piece. (Read more President Obama stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.