Sorry, CSI Fans: Real Crime Labs Suck

Corruption, incompetence widespread
By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff
Posted Oct 13, 2010 1:53 PM CDT
Sorry, CSI Fans: Real Crime Labs Suck
In this 2001 publicity image released by CBS, Marg Helgenberger, left, and William Petersen examine evidence in a scene from the first season of "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation."   (AP Photo/CBS, Robert Voets)

CSI and its endless spinoffs paint crime labs as magical places where brilliant scientists use cutting-edge science to solve impossible cases. But “that image is quite far from reality,” writes Professor Douglas Starr in the Boston Globe. Real-life crime labs are “wildly inconsistent: many labs have poorly trained investigators, antiquated equipment” and huge case backlogs. In a statistical analysis of overturned convictions last year, nearly 70% involved crime lab or forensics mistakes.

An investigation in North Carolina, for example, found that the state lab routinely falsified results to suit the prosecution, resulting in more than 100 wrongful convictions and as many as three wrongful executions. The National Academy of Sciences, after finding widespread inadequacies in labs around the country, has proposed taking them out of police departments and making them independent, scientific entities. Until that happens, remember that CSI is “more a morality tale than a portrait of reality.” (More CSI stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.