Presidents Have to Be 35? Time to Scrap That Rule

Maybe modern problems require younger minds: Daniel Freedman
By John Johnson,  Newser Staff
Posted Jun 15, 2011 1:36 PM CDT

(Newser) – Americans require their presidents to be at least 35 years old because surely nobody younger could run the country. It's time to retire this "undemocratic, and even un-American" rule, writes Daniel Freedman at Forbes. People can decide for themselves whether "they want the 'wise' 45-year-old or the 'inexperienced' 32-year-old," he writes. "It may be true that in the conventional sense you become wiser with age, perhaps to deal with today’s problems we need youthful enthusiasm and a willingness to challenge the status quo and take risks."

story continues below

Forget the historical figures such as Jesus or Alexander the Great who would be deemed unfit to run. Just look at what the likes of Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Steve Jobs accomplished before the age of 30, let alone 35. Contrast that with someone who has spent virtually his entire adult life in politics: the "mature" 40-something Anthony Weiner. Let's allow American voters to make the choice, Freedman writes. (Read more age discrimination stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.