X

TSA: We Were Right to Take That Cupcake

...because it was a cupcake in a jar
By Kate Seamons,  Newser Staff
Posted Jan 10, 2012 10:20 AM CST
Updated Jan 14, 2012 7:00 AM CST

(Newser) – Cupcakegate 2011 is proving to have quite the shelf life. The TSA commented on the sugary brouhaha this week, by way of a blog post on the topic. If you'll recall, security agents in Las Vegas confiscated a cupcake that Rebecca Hains was trying to take through security late last month because of its gel-like frosting. Outrage ensued. But as the TSA explains, there's one problem with the whole story: Hains wasn't carrying a traditional cupcake through security.

story continues below

That, apparently, would have been fine. But Hains' "cupcake" was actually a "cupcake in a jar" (see image in gallery). "Unlike a thin layer of icing that resides on the top of most cupcakes, this cupcake had a thick layer of icing inside a jar," explains the TSA. "The officer in this case used their discretion on whether to allow the newfangled modern take on a cupcake per 3-1-1 guidelines. They chose not to let it go." If you're still scoffing at the decision, the TSA would like you to consider the following point: "Do you think an explosive would be concealed in an ominous item that would draw attention, or something as simple as a cute cupcake jar?" (Read more TSA stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X