When Gawker exposed the Craigslist wanderings of ex-Congressman Chris Lee, it justified the story as newsworthy because Lee's votes on DADT and abortion funding "suggests a certain comfort with publicly scrutinizing others' sex lives." Oh, please, writes Steve Kornacki at Salon, save the false piety. When Gawker runs a salacious story about a famous person's sex life—as it did with Christine O'Donnell and John Travolta—it tries too hard to claim a "moral high ground" for doing so.
"All of this rationalizing seems a bit silly," writes Kornacki. Gawker runs stories like these for one reason: to generate traffic. It should take a page from its sister site, Deadspin, which unapologetically dishes the dirt on sports figures without the attempt at moralizing. "Gawker might try being just as honest with itself," he writes. Click for the full essay.
(Read more Chris Lee stories.)