Canyon Older Than Thought?

Study says formation began 17M years ago; others stick to 5-6M
By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff
Posted Mar 6, 2008 7:56 PM CST
Canyon Older Than Thought?
Water levels at the Colorado River's Horseshoe Bend begin to rise along the beaches just hours after the Glen Canyon Dam jet tubes began releasing water Wednesday, March 5, 2008, in Page, Ariz. (AP Photo/Matt York)   (Associated Press)

(Newser) – The Grand Canyon might be three times older than previously thought, the Washington Post reports. A study in Science claims that a river—not the Colorado, but a smaller one—began carving the oldest part of the canyon 17 million years ago. It contends that the canyon-building greatly accelerated 5 or 6 million years ago, which is why most geologists use that time frame as its age.

The researchers reached their conclusions by using uranium half-life dating on the canyon’s mammillaries, large rounded rocks that form near the top of a water table. Skeptics disagree. One expert says the older theory is not backed up by evidence in the form of sediment. "They clearly have not taken the time to be rigorous and actually understand the regional geography," he said. (Read more Grand Canyon stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.